On Monday June 12, [email protected] wrote:
>
> And just recently we received a spate of spam that came from a domain
> that disappeared almost immediately. Domain names are cheap. They can
> vouch for the spam run. Then what happens to them doesn't matter. But
> the SPF record passes.
>
So the obvious next step (Which I remember being discussed on the SPF
mailing list shortly before I had to unsubscribe) is to develop a
mechanism to measure the credibility of new domains. No point doing
this until authenticity is fairly reliable, but once it is, that will
be the next logical step.
> {^_-} There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.
> Too many people think SPF is a free lunch.
Can't argue with that - both points are very true.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
