>> > After some digging, I found that this was being caused by tmpfs not having a
>> > time granularity set, thus inheriting the default 1s granularity.
>> That's a great little discovery, and a very good report and analysis:
>> thank you. Seems tmpfs got missed when s_time_gran was added in 2.6.11,
>> and I (tmpfs maintainer) failed to notice that patch going past.
>Ah, ok, it was mentioned to me there was a maintainer for tmpfs,
>
Well I was not for sure there was one. I just repeated what Linus said to
me a while ago when trying to figure out why a patch did not get
in or replied to. :p
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]