Re: [PATCH] revert "swsusp: fix breakage with swap on lvm"

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 05:02:22PM +0000, Linux Kernel wrote:
 > commit 2b322ce210aec74ae0d02938d3a01e29fe079469
 > tree a9cb9aa9530cadacae62caf009db506db16eb3c1
 > parent bdaff4a331db46f3bd953f413316c4603c4004b4
 > author Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:59:58 -0800
 > committer Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:38:07 -0800
 > 
 > [PATCH] revert "swsusp: fix breakage with swap on lvm"
 > 
 > This was a temporary thing for 2.6.16.
 > 
 > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
 > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
 > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
 > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
 > 
 >  kernel/power/swsusp.c |    4 +++-
 >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 > 
 > diff --git a/kernel/power/swsusp.c b/kernel/power/swsusp.c
 > index 2d9d08f..4e90905 100644
 > --- a/kernel/power/swsusp.c
 > +++ b/kernel/power/swsusp.c
 > @@ -153,11 +153,13 @@ static int swsusp_swap_check(void) /* Th
 >  {
 >  	int i;
 >  
 > +	if (!swsusp_resume_device)
 > +		return -ENODEV;
 >  	spin_lock(&swap_lock);
 >  	for (i = 0; i < MAX_SWAPFILES; i++) {
 >  		if (!(swap_info[i].flags & SWP_WRITEOK))
 >  			continue;
 > -		if (!swsusp_resume_device || is_resume_device(swap_info + i)) {
 > +		if (is_resume_device(swap_info + i)) {
 >  			spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
 >  			root_swap = i;
 >  			return 0;

So, now I'm getting bug reports from users about .17rc breaking
their resume again. (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194784)

If this was a temporary thing, what should we be doing to keep
old installations working ?

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/