Re: [PATCH] header install: cosmetic cleanups to kbuild infrastructure

On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 16:34 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> That was i thinko that slept through. In general avoiding all the
> specific dependencies in the mess that is named Makefile is good but
> in this case there is no good reason to use the prepare targets. 

OK, I've applied your patch and then switched that back to depend on
include/linux/version.h again. Thanks.

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] header install: cosmetic cleanups to kbuild infrastructure
  - From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] header install: cosmetic cleanups to kbuild infrastructure
  - From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] header install: cosmetic cleanups to kbuild infrastructure
  - From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] hptiop: HighPoint RocketRAID 3xxx controller driver
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.17-rc6-rt3
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] header install: cosmetic cleanups to kbuild infrastructure
Next by thread: [PATCH] libata: increase max-sectors to 256
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]