Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

* Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:

> I agree with your point in the thread -- most users and distros don't 
> change their main fs on a whim.  But I also point out that these 
> extent+48bit changes _do_ change the format in an incompatible way...

yeah. /me learns to not post too much while watching football ;)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
    • From: Gerrit Huizenga <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH -rt] Priority preemption latency
• Next by Date: Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter)
• Previous by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
• Next by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]