On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:00:17 +0100 David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 13:28 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > Priority: not critical; makes init code discardable.
> >
> > Fix section mismatch warnings:
> > WARNING: fs/jffs2/jffs2.o - Section mismatch: reference
> > to .init.text:jffs2_zlib_init from .text between
> > 'jffs2_compressors_init' (at offset 0x546) and
> > 'jffs2_compressors_exit'
>
> Some of this is already in -mm, isn't it?
Ack, one of them is, yes. Sorry I missed it.
> I'm wary of this kind of change from drive-by patchers now -- I had to
> commit two fixes recently to remove __exit from functions which are
> actually called in the error case from the init function.
Surely those would have been caught with the modpost checker,
if the patch submitter(s) used it... ??
FWIW, I check the ones that I submit very carefully, but I too
can make mistakes.
> For those exit-and-error functions, I think we actually want an
> __initexit marker. In the built-in case, it can actually be discarded
> with the init code. In the modular case, it needs to be kept.
That sounds good, yes.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
