On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>
> One possible solution to the version-confusion that would avoid duplicating
> features would be to merge the fs/ext{2,3} to fs/ext, then make fs/ext
> register itself as a filesystem under "ext2", "ext3", and "ext4".
But the thing is, technical people don't actually care about the version
confusion.
The real issue is that ext3 is a stable filesystem, and the ext4 stuff
buys fundamentally and absolutely _nothing_ for the vast majority of uses.
Except pain.
So the real reason for the split would be the _user_ split. There are
people who want big filesystems, and there are people who don't care.
It's that simple.
> I've heard quite some griping about the amount of duplicated code
> between ext2 and ext3;
That's a total piece of bullshit. Nobody seriously gripes about the
duplication, and the ones that do have absolutely no idea what that split
bought us. Ignore them.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
