Re: [PATCH 3/5] VT binding: Update fbcon to support binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Antonio,

On Friday, 9. June 2006 10:40, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
>     5. When fbcon is completely unbound from the console layer, fbcon will
>        also release (iow, decrement module reference counts to zero) all fbdev
>        drivers. In other words, a bind or unbind request from the console layer
>        will propagate down to the framebuffer drivers.
> 
>     6. If fbcon is not bound to the console, it will ignore all notifier
>        events (except driver registration and unregistration) and all sysfs
>        requests.

Wow! 

Now one can:

	- implement different framebuffer drivers for a chip. 
	- try a stable and development version without rebooting,
	- have probing with user interaction ("if you see me please 
	  press enter else I will try the previous driver in 15 seconds.") 
	  instead of deciding on "failsafe" (vga/vesa) and "fast" 
	  (special driver) at boot.

I love it!

Just the take_over_console() as alternative API looks strange. 

It's ok as an intermeditate step (likely, if I remember the discussions
correctly). If it should stay, it should require the console to 
be registered first. 

Can be changed later, once as you make progress and don't reach a release
kernel. This is NO show stopper for me.

Progress is the most important thing for development in this areas 
until it reaches a release kernel.


Regards

Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux