On Sat, 2006-06-10 06:23:32 -0400, Justin Piszcz <[email protected]> wrote: > SUMMARY: > I pose the following question in the subject, as over the years running > smartd and having failed disks, I have always first been alerted of bad > sectors and such through dmesg or logcheck. Even with a bad disk I > currently have, smartd does not pickup any errors, except those with the > kernel writes to syslog. What do smartctl -H smartctl --all tell you? MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Death and Diagnosis of a Dying Hard Drive - Is S.M.A.R.T. useful?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: The Death and Diagnosis of a Dying Hard Drive - Is S.M.A.R.T. useful?
- References:
- The Death and Diagnosis of a Dying Hard Drive - Is S.M.A.R.T. useful?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- The Death and Diagnosis of a Dying Hard Drive - Is S.M.A.R.T. useful?
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Slimming down struct inode
- Next by Date: Re: The Death and Diagnosis of a Dying Hard Drive - Is S.M.A.R.T. useful?
- Previous by thread: The Death and Diagnosis of a Dying Hard Drive - Is S.M.A.R.T. useful?
- Next by thread: Re: The Death and Diagnosis of a Dying Hard Drive - Is S.M.A.R.T. useful?
- Index(es):
 |