The simple and level irq handlers prevent reentrancy. For those irq types
reentrancy should not happen. Instead of silently going back omit a warning
message. Also do not reenable the interrupt in that case.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
kernel/irq/chip.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm/kernel/irq/chip.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm.orig/kernel/irq/chip.c 2006-06-10 10:32:49.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm/kernel/irq/chip.c 2006-06-10 10:42:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -208,8 +208,11 @@
spin_lock(&desc->lock);
- if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS))
+ if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "handle_simple_irq reentered while "
+ "processing irq %d\n", irq);
goto out_unlock;
+ }
desc->status &= ~(IRQ_REPLAY | IRQ_WAITING);
kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs[irq]++;
@@ -251,8 +254,11 @@
spin_lock(&desc->lock);
mask_ack_irq(desc, irq);
- if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS))
+ if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "handle_level_irq reentered while "
+ "processing irq %d\n", irq);
goto out;
+ }
desc->status &= ~(IRQ_REPLAY | IRQ_WAITING);
kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs[irq]++;
@@ -273,9 +279,9 @@
spin_lock(&desc->lock);
desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
-out:
if (!(desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED) && desc->chip->unmask)
desc->chip->unmask(irq);
+out:
spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
}
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]