Re: [RFC] [patch 5/6] [Network namespace] ipv4 isolation

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Rick Jones wrote:

> > I think you'll need to make it so this code has zero impact when not
> > configured.
> 
> Indeed, and over stuff other than loopback too.  I'll not so humbly suggest :)

Yes, I meant the whole lot.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC] [patch 0/6] [Network namespace] introduction
    • From: [email protected]
  • [RFC] [patch 5/6] [Network namespace] ipv4 isolation
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [RFC] [patch 5/6] [Network namespace] ipv4 isolation
    • From: James Morris <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] [patch 5/6] [Network namespace] ipv4 isolation
    • From: Rick Jones <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/6] IPC namespace core
• Next by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [patch 5/6] [Network namespace] ipv4 isolation
• Next by thread: [RFC] [patch 3/6] [Network namespace] Network devices isolation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]