Re: [RFC] [patch 5/6] [Network namespace] ipv4 isolation

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Rick Jones wrote:

> > I think you'll need to make it so this code has zero impact when not
> > configured.
> 
> Indeed, and over stuff other than loopback too.  I'll not so humbly suggest :)

Yes, I meant the whole lot.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC] [patch 0/6] [Network namespace] introduction
  - From: [email protected]
- [RFC] [patch 5/6] [Network namespace] ipv4 isolation
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: [RFC] [patch 5/6] [Network namespace] ipv4 isolation
  - From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [patch 5/6] [Network namespace] ipv4 isolation
  - From: Rick Jones <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/6] IPC namespace core
Next by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [patch 5/6] [Network namespace] ipv4 isolation
Next by thread: [RFC] [patch 3/6] [Network namespace] Network devices isolation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]