Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes.  Re-read what I wrote.  To put it another way, "mkfs S1 + resize to 
> S2" does not produce precisely the same layout as "mkfs S2".

This is normal for ext3 since it creates less inodes, right?

Gruss
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mem_map is part of the FLATMEM model
• Previous by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
• Next by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]