Andreas Dilger wrote:
Maybe we should start by deleting ext2 because it is old and obsolete? The reality is that we will never merge the forks back once they are made.
We _already have_ a relevant example: ext2 -> ext3. A useful fork is in the tree, and you're working on it. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- References:
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Alex Tomas <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Alex Tomas <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- From: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Prev by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Previous by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Next by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Index(es):
 |