Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:

Right, and that proves my point. When you start making major changes like 32->64 bit block numbers, you should communicate to the user (with a big blinky "ext4" sign) that his filesystem metadata will change a lot, not a little. Not to mention that such code will add yet more "if (new) .. else .." code.


Forking the code and registering another filesystem name are two separate things, though.

Certainly.  Hopefully one would follow the other, for maximum benefit.

	Jeff




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux