On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:43 -0300, Matheus Izvekov wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Lee Revell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:27 -0300, Matheus Izvekov wrote:
> > > Sorry, i took a look at the code which handles this and swappiness = 0
> > > doesnt seem to imply that process memory will never be swapped out.
> > >
> >
> > OK, then use mlockall().
> >
> > Lee
> >
> >
>
> If i make init mlockall, would all child processes be mlocked too?
No.
> If not, using this to enforce a system wide policy seems a bit hacky
> and non trivial.
>
Well, what you are trying to do seems hacky. What real world problem
are you trying to solve that setting swappiness to 0 is not sufficient
for?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
