Re: 2.6.17-rc6-rt1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 08:55 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 15:42 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 15:11 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 14:57 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > > > All the round trips under strace are in the 2ms range.
> > > > 
> > > >   How on earth can it be that stracing the ping gives better
> > > > performance???
> > > 
> > > Was busy fixing a scheduling while atomic bug. I just verified that I
> > > have the same weird behaviour. I'm looking into it.
> > 
> > I downloaded and patched a ping.c to do a user triggered latency trace
> > around recvfrom() of a ping -c 1 127.0.0.1 running SCHED_RR.  We
> > schedule away at 25us, do aaaall kinds of interesting stuff, and come
> > back at 42234us.  If you want the trace, holler.  It's 51k bzipped.
> 
> What priority ?

Bare minimum.  None of the other tasks that were scheduled were rt in
their own right though.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux