Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

[Matthew Frost <artusemrys@sbcglobal.net>]

Alex Tomas wrote:
> > > > > > Jeff Garzik (JG) writes:
>
>  JG> Think about how this will be deployed in production, long term.
>
>  JG> If extents are not made default at some point, then no one will use
>  JG> the feature, and it should not be merged.
>
> sorry, I disagree. for example, NUMA isn't default and shouldn't be.
> but we have it in the tree and any one may choose to use it.

NUMA is designed to cope with a hardware feature, which not everybody 
has.  Filesystem upgrades are not qualitatively similar; it does not 
depend on one's hardware design as to whether one uses ext3, let alone 
extents.  Your logic is faulty.

 the same
> with extents. let's have it in. but let's make clear it's experimental,
> it makes sense for large files only, it isn't backward compatible and
> so on.
>
> thanks, Alex
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/