Matheus Izvekov <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
> I had a somewhat similar idea, once i have time to implement it ill
> submit a patch.
> My idea consisted of adding the capability to specify a device for
> tmpfs mounting. if you dont specify any device, tmpfs continues to
> behave the way it currently is. But if you do, once data doesnt fit on
> ram (or some other limit) anymore, it will flush things to this
> device. my intention was to reuse swap code for this, so you mount a
> tmpfs passing the dev node of some unused swap device, and it works
> just like tmpfs with a dedicated swap partition.
tmpfs does use swap currently. Giving tmpfs a dedicated swap space is dumb,
as it takes away the possibility of using that space for swapping when not
in use by tmpfs (and viceversa).
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
