From: Gerrit Renker <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:09:33 +0100
> That is why I held back regarding the IPv6 port: I can ensure that
> this (IPv4) code is up to standard and to date, but am lacking the
> required additional time to implement the same for IPv6. I am
> trying to contact people to help with the port, but for the moment I
> will take responsibility only for the IPv4 version.
It's not like an ipv6 port is such a big pile of work.
I'd say it would take you an afternoon, max.
You don't have to test it to the point where it is ISO9000 compliant,
that's not what is being asked of you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
