Re: [2.6.17-rc5-mm2] crash when doing second suspend: BUG in arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c:174

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> But the problem is that there's nothing which keeps 
> track of whether the re-plugged cpus 1-N are the "same" 
> as the unplugged 1-N, and so nothing can apply the same 
> per-cpu settings to them.  In the suspend/resume case 
> they clearly are, but in the general remove/add case, do 
> you really want the new CPU to get the same state as the 
> old one just because it ends up with the same logical 
> CPU number?  Perhaps, but what if it doesn't even have 
> the same capabilities? 

> (Do we support heterogeneous 
> CPUs anyway?)

It works for some people, but it certainly falls into unsupported
category.

-- 
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux