Re: [PATCH] fix generic HDLC synclink mismatch build error

Andrew Morton wrote:

Well your patch looked reasonable, except it muddies the CONFIG_foo
namespace.  So could you rework it thusly:

OK

This at least looks like light at the end of
the tunnel, barring any further sniping.

I'll generate another patch along those lines.
If it's accepted, fine. If not, also fine.

--
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] fix generic HDLC synclink mismatch build error
    • From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fix generic HDLC synclink mismatch build error
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fix generic HDLC synclink mismatch build error
    • From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fix generic HDLC synclink mismatch build error
    • From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fix generic HDLC synclink mismatch build error
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Interrupts disabled for too long in printk
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Twofish cipher - split out common c code
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix generic HDLC synclink mismatch build error
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix generic HDLC synclink mismatch build error
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]