Re: [Patch] sched: mc/smt power savings sched policy

On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:59:08AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> This MC code is a maze of #ifdefs within functions and getting harder to 
> follow with each subsequent patch. Can we not deviate so much from kernel 
> style?

build_sched_domains() originally was not designed with this many sched
domains in mind.. I can take a look at cleaning up of the sched domains
setup..

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [Patch] sched: mc/smt power savings sched policy
  - From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] sched: mc/smt power savings sched policy
  - From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix missing hdlc symbols for synclink drivers
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc5 0/8] Kernel memory leak detector 0.5
Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] sched: mc/smt power savings sched policy
Next by thread: Re: [Patch] sched: mc/smt power savings sched policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]