Re: [RFC 0/5] sched: Add CPU rate caps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam Vilain wrote:
Peter Williams wrote:

They shouldn't interfere as which scheduler to use is a boot time selection and only one scheduler is in force. It's mainly a coding matter and in particular whether the "scheduler driver" interface would need to be modified or whether your scheduler can be implemented using the current interface.

Yes, that's the key issue I think - the interface now has more inputs.

I guess the big question is - is there a corresponding concept in
PlugSched?  for instance, is there a reference in the task_struct to the
current scheduling domain, or is it more CKRM-style with classification
modules?
It uses the standard run queue structure with per scheduler
modifications (via a union) to handle the different ways that the
schedulers manage priority arrays (so yes). As I said it restricts
itself to scheduling matters within each run queue and leaves the
wider aspects to the normal code.


Ok, so there is no existing "classification" abstraction?  The
classification is tied to the scheduler implementation?

At first guess, it sounds like adding your scheduler could be as simple as taking a copy of ingosched.c (which is the implementation of the standard scheduler within PlugSched) and then making your modifications. You could probably even share the same run queue components but there's nothing to stop you adding new ones.

Each scheduler can also have its own per task data via a union in the task struct.

Ok, sounds like that problem is solved - just the classification one
remaining.

OK.  I'm waiting for the next -mm kernel before I make the next release.

Looking forward to it.

A gzipped tar file containing the patch series (against 2.6.17-rc5-mm3) in a form suitable for use with quilt is now available at:

<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/plugsched-6.3.2-for-2.6.17-rc5-mm3.series.tar.gz?download>

It's still a bit light in the description area but I figured that it's better than nothing. Hopefully, the patch names give some idea of their purpose.

Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   [email protected]

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux