Re: [PATCHSET] block: fix PIO cache coherency bug, take 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:47:40AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 16:34 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > What has zero copy (your reply) got to do with faulting pages into
> > userspace (my message).  I'm sorry, I don't understand why you've
> > brought this up.
> The zero copy case is the case where we end up with user and kernel
> mappings simultaneously on the page.  The nopage (or fault) case is
> where we end up with them sequentially.  Both cases actually require the
> same cache treatment, but it's easiest to understand in the zero copy
> case.

When does the zero copy case occur?

Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   -
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux