* Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/06/06, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> ah. That's a real deadlock scenario. Does the patch below fix it? If
> >> yes then i think this is a candidate for 2.6.17 merging too.
> >
> >actually, the replacement patch below is better i think - it moves the
> >ide_lock taking to outside the printing section. That should still be OK
> >as we dont call other functions from within the section, and it should
> >also result in slightly more robust printing, as the whole printing code
> >will be atomic under ide_lock.
>
> Probably fixed, thanks.
could you send a confirmation if/when you have tried this? I dont get
the same message (i have another IDE chipset).
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
