On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:24:53 -0700
Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]> wrote:
| On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 20:12:23 -0300, "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <[email protected]> wrote:
|
| > | I understand. My intent was different, however. One of the bigger sticking
| > | points for usb-serial was its interaction with line disciplines, which are
| > | notorious for looping back and requesting writes from callbacks
| > | (e.g. h_hdlc.c). They are also sensitive to drivers lying about the
| > | amount of free space in their FIFOs. This is something you never test
| > | when driving a serial port from an application, no matter how cleverly
| > | written.
|
| > In all the tests the modem was configured to answer the calls, and the
| > cell phone was configured to dial to the modem (my home's number).
|
| This is exactly backwards, and so it tests different code paths.
| The line discipline is involved into driving a cooked mode port,
| e.g. the one where getty is.
I was going to try it last night and realized that my cell phone
can't answer data calls. :((
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
