Re: readahead benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:28:07 +0800
Fengguang Wu <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 01:50:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > readahead-kconfig-options.patch
> [...] 
> >  It's early days yet - needs heaps more performance testing.  The results
> >  from "Linux Portal" <[email protected]> were discouraging.
> 
> I found this mail from the lkml archive, did you happen to have more
> results?
> 

Sorry, I had the wrong tester.  Voluspa <[email protected]>: "Conclusion: On
_this_ machine, with _these_ operations, Adaptive Readahead in its current
incarnation and default settings is a _loss_."

> 
> There is an interesting (although simple) benchmark of Wu's adaptive
> readahead patchset (v12) together with graphs here:
> 
>   http://linux.inet.hr/adaptive_readahead_benchmark.html
> 
> In that simple test it definitely looks promising (3x speedup).

That's postgreql again.

We know there's a problem at present with postgresql.  Has anyone tried to
fix it, without going and rewriting everything?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux