Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ar Sul, 2006-06-04 am 12:22 -0400, ysgrifennodd Steven Rostedt:
> But can't this machine still cause an interrupt storm if the interrupt
> comes on a wrong line, and we don't call the handler for the interrupt
> source because we are now honoring disable_irq?

Yes - that is why we can't honour disable_irq in this case but have to
hope 8)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux