Ar Sul, 2006-06-04 am 12:22 -0400, ysgrifennodd Steven Rostedt:
> But can't this machine still cause an interrupt storm if the interrupt
> comes on a wrong line, and we don't call the handler for the interrupt
> source because we are now honoring disable_irq?
Yes - that is why we can't honour disable_irq in this case but have to
hope 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]