On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 12:41:21 +0200, Ingo Molnar said: > could you please apply the following patches ontop of -mm3: > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/lockdep-patches/lockdep-combo-2.6.17-rc5-mm3.patch > http://redhat.com/~mingo/lockdep-patches/lockdep-tracer-2.6.17-rc5-mm3.patch Just for grins, I tried building this, and got this error: CC kernel/irq/handle.o kernel/irq/handle.c:246:35: error: macro "early_init_irq_lock_type" passed 1 arguments, but takes just 0 kernel/irq/handle.c:247: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token make[2]: *** [kernel/irq/handle.o] Error 1 It won't build if you don't have CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS defined - and that is defined like this: config TRACE_IRQFLAGS bool default y depends on TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT depends on PROVE_SPIN_LOCKING || PROVE_RW_LOCKING but my config has: % grep PROVE .config # CONFIG_PROVE_SPIN_LOCKING is not set # CONFIG_PROVE_RW_LOCKING is not set # CONFIG_PROVE_MUTEX_LOCKING is not set # CONFIG_PROVE_RWSEM_LOCKING is not set So using the defaults for the PROVE_* won't compile clean. Yes, probably a stupid setting for anybody applying the patches, but.. ;) (I'm off to go build kernels without the patch, and with the PROVE_* set)..
Attachment:
pgpKsa4cOw3sH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- 2.6.17-rc5-mm3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3
- From: "Barry K. Nathan" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3
- From: "Michal Piotrowski" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- 2.6.17-rc5-mm3
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3: bad unlock ordering (reiser4?)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ftdi_sio patch
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3
- Next by thread: [patch, -rc5-mm3] lock validator: early_init_irq_lock_type() build fix
- Index(es):
 |