Re: [PATCH 8/11] usbserial: pl2303: Ports tty functions.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 15:44:35 -0700
Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:

| On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 03:41:21PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
| > On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:50:14 -0700, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
| > > On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:03:14AM -0300, Luiz Fernando N.Capitulino wrote:
| > 
| > > >   2. The new pl2303's set_termios() can (still) sleep. Serial Core's
| > > >      documentation says that that method must not sleep, but I couldn't find
| > > >      where in the Serial Core code it's called in atomic context. So, is this
| > > >      still true? Isn't the Serial Core's documentation out of date?
| > > 
| > > If this is true then we should just stop the port right now, as the USB
| > > devices can not handle this.  They need to be able to sleep to
| > > accomplish this functionality.
| > > 
| > > Russell, is this a requirement of the serial layer?  Why?
| > 
| > Shouldn't it be all right to schedule the change at the moment of
| > that call and have it happen later? Resisting a temptation to abuse
| > keventd and schedule_work and using a tasklet may help with latency
| > enough to make this tolerable.
| 
| Some devices require more than one usb message to set all of the proper
| termios bits in the device.  Creating a way to queue them up and fire
| them off later, and handle errors if something happened in the middle,
| after we told userspace the termios change succeeded, might get quite
| messy :(

 But set_termios() returns nothing, and look what termios
man page says about tcsetattr() return value:

"""
Note that tcsetattr() returns success if any of the requested changes could
be successfully carried out. Therefore, when making multiple changes it may be
necessary to follow this call with a further call to tcgetattr() to check that
all changes have been performed successfully.
"""

 Also, why do they need to sleep? Did you note that my version of
set_mctrl() is atomic?

-- 
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux