Re: [patch] fix smt nice lock contention and optimization

On Saturday 03 June 2006 03:43, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> OK, final rolled up patch with everyone's changes. I fixed one bug
> introduced by Con's earlier patch that there is an unpaired
> spin_trylock/spin_unlock in the for loop of dependent_sleeper().
> Chris, Con, Nick - please review and provide your signed-off-by line.
> Andrew - please consider for -mm inclusion.  Thanks.

Thanks for turning my half baked code into something nice.  acked-by from me 
as well.

-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] fix smt nice lock contention and optimization
    • From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2GB MMC/SD cards
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] cfq: ioprio inherit rt class
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] fix smt nice lock contention and optimization
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc5 0/8] Kernel memory leak detector 0.4
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]