Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (Jes Sorensen)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

A: No.
Q: Should I leave quotations after my reply?

On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:00:26PM +0530, Abu M. Muttalib wrote:
> I anticipated that my application which was running perfectly on
> linux-2.4.19-rmk7-pxa1 box will run as it is on linux-2.6.13 box as well.
> But alas, this is not the case and I fail to understand why it is so? ;-(

I can't tell you. I don't have the source of your application and I my
crystal ball is getting old so I can't read the kernel messages from
your screen.

Anyway, try to recreate the problem with a *recent* 2.6 kernel. If you
can still recreate your problem, post a log over here.


Erik

-- 
+-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 --
| Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux