Re: [PATCH 1/2] fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding is possible

* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> hm, could you please merge this ontop of the stacktrace-output 
> beautification patch below that Andrew already has in his post-mm2 
> tree? (or the other way around - whichever you prefer)

which also needs the following addon.

	Ingo

Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -292,7 +292,6 @@ void show_trace(struct task_struct *tsk,
 			 * out the call path that was taken. \
 			 */ \
 			printk_address(addr); \
-			printk("\n"); \
 		} \
 	} while (0)
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/2] fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding is possible
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding is possible
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding is possible
• Next by Date: Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (Jes Sorensen)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding is possible
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding is possible
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]