On Thursday 01 June 2006 00:35, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:01:56PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 May 2006 17:03, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:13:53AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > Yes because you if modular works you don't need to build it in.
> > > >
> > > > Modular was working at some point on x86-64 for kdb and the original 2.6
> > > > version of kgdb was nearly there too.
> > >
> > > FWIW, the only change the current version of kgdb makes that would
> > > prevent it from being totally modular is the debugger_active check in
> >
> > Can you post the patch and a description?
>
> The change is a simple if (atomic_read(&debugger_active)) return right
> at the start. And I'm embarrased to say the change predates me on the
> project so I'm not 100% sure on the lineage and it might be totally
> bogus now.
And why do you need it? Where does the debugger call might sleep?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
