Re: mem_map definition / declaration.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Baechle wrote:
> mm/memory defines mem_map and max_mapnr only if !CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES.
> <linux/mm.h> declares mem_map[] if !CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM.  Shouldn't
> both depend on !CONFIG_FLATMEM?  As things are now mem_map may be
> declared but not defined for a non-NUMA sparsemem system which may make
> tracking a remaining mem_map reference in the code a little harder.

Sounds suspect for sure.  I will take a look and see.  Thanks for the
head up.

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux