Re: linux-2.6 x86_64 kgdb issue

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:13:53AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:

[snip]
> Yes because you if modular works you don't need to build it in.
> 
> Modular was working at some point on x86-64 for kdb and the original 2.6 version
> of kgdb was nearly there too.

FWIW, the only change the current version of kgdb makes that would
prevent it from being totally modular is the debugger_active check in
__might_sleep().

-- 
Tom Rini
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: linux-2.6 x86_64 kgdb issue
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: linux-2.6 x86_64 kgdb issue
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: linux-2.6 x86_64 kgdb issue
    • From: Piet Delaney <[email protected]>
  • Re: linux-2.6 x86_64 kgdb issue
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [rfc][patch] remove racy sync_page?
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
• Previous by thread: Re: linux-2.6 x86_64 kgdb issue
• Next by thread: Re: linux-2.6 x86_64 kgdb issue
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]