Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()

From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:55:26 -0600

> For example, it goes to great pains to permute upper order bits in
> the local address, which for most connections will be a constant
> value.

Consider an apache server hosting thousands of virtual
hosts.  The local address will be different for every
such host.

Please drop linux-kernel in any future replies, this
discussion belongs on netdev not linux-kernel.  Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
    • From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
    • From: Raghuram <[email protected]>
  • Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
    • From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [git patch] libata resume fix
• Next by Date: Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts
• Previous by thread: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
• Next by thread: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]