* Roland Dreier <[email protected]> wrote:
> > on lockdep we have a quite big spinlock_t, so keep the size down.
>
> Yes, that builds fine.
>
> However the kernel won't boot for me... it oopses early on in
> save_stack_trace(). I'm attaching a bootlog, plus another try booting
> with nmi_watchdog=0, plus my config.
there's some bad interaction between the new dwarf2 unwind info
stackframe walker code in mm1 and lockdep's stacktrace code on x86_64.
I'm investigating this currently, meanwhile you can try the quick hack
below.
Ingo
Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/stacktrace.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -127,7 +127,8 @@ save_context_stack(struct stack_trace *t
skip--;
if (trace->nr_entries >= trace->max_entries)
break;
- if (!addr)
+#warning fixme
+// if (!addr)
return 0;
/*
* Stack frames must go forwards (otherwise a loop could
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
