On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 16:20 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:55:46PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > May 30 20:25:56 ltg01-fedora kernel: which lock already depends on the new lock,
> >
> > ... but there was an observed code sequence before which was the other
> > way around ...
>
> That phrase could use some rewording IMO. It sounds more like a question
> than a statement.
if you have suggestions please share them... you're the native United
Kingdomian.... :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
