On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 18:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> I'd suggest that __module_address() should do the same thing, from an API neatness
> POV. Although perhaps that's mot very useful if we didn't take a ref on the returned
> object (but module_text_address() doesn't either).
>
> Also, the name's a bit misleading - it sounds like it returns the address
> of a module or something. __module_any_address() would be better, perhaps?
How about __valid_module_address() so that it describes exactly what it
is doing. Or __module_address_valid().
-- Steve
>
> Also, how come this doesn't need modlist_lock()?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
