Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Has any discussion about this problem lead to some consensus?
Argghhh.. I completely forgot about this.
What do you think of the kmap_atomic_pio() (notoriously bad at names,
but it should get the point across) and kunmap_atomic_pio(), the latter
accepting a read/write flag to note if we wrote to a vm page?
This is basically Tejuns original patch set, just moving it out of the
block layer so it's a generel exported property of the kmap api.
What was the problem with Tejun's patchset already to which RMK (and
many others) agreed?
I do have hardware that exhibits the problem and therefore I wish the
discussion could be resumed.
I'll follow up soon. Sorry.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]