Re: [PATCHSET] block: fix PIO cache coherency bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Has any discussion about this problem lead to some consensus?

Argghhh.. I completely forgot about this.

What do you think of the kmap_atomic_pio() (notoriously bad at names,
but it should get the point across) and kunmap_atomic_pio(), the latter
accepting a read/write flag to note if we wrote to a vm page?

This is basically Tejuns original patch set, just moving it out of the
block layer so it's a generel exported property of the kmap api.

What was the problem with Tejun's patchset already to which RMK (and many others) agreed?

I do have hardware that exhibits the problem and therefore I wish the discussion could be resumed.

I'll follow up soon.  Sorry.

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux