On Mon, 29 May 2006 23:27:51 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
>
> teach special (non-nested) unlocking code to the lock validator. Has no
> effect on non-lockdep kernels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 +-
> net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ linux/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *xfrm_p
> afinfo = xfrm_policy_afinfo[family];
> if (likely(afinfo != NULL))
> read_lock(&afinfo->lock);
> - read_unlock(&xfrm_policy_afinfo_lock);
> + read_unlock_non_nested(&xfrm_policy_afinfo_lock);
> return afinfo;
> }
>
> Index: linux/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> +++ linux/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static struct xfrm_state_afinfo *xfrm_st
> afinfo = xfrm_state_afinfo[family];
> if (likely(afinfo != NULL))
> read_lock(&afinfo->lock);
> - read_unlock(&xfrm_state_afinfo_lock);
> + read_unlock_non_nested(&xfrm_state_afinfo_lock);
> return afinfo;
> }
>
I got a bunch of rejects here due to changes in git-net.patch. Please
verify the result. It could well be wrong (the changes in there are odd).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
