Re: [patch 11/61] lock validator: lockdep: small xfs init_rwsem() cleanup

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

On Mon, 29 May 2006 23:23:59 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> nit_rwsem() has no return value. This is not a problem if init_rwsem()
> is a function, but it's a problem if it's a do { ... } while (0) macro.
> (which lockdep introduces)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/linux-2.6/mrlock.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/mrlock.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/mrlock.h
> +++ linux/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/mrlock.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ typedef struct {
>  } mrlock_t;
>  
>  #define mrinit(mrp, name)	\
> -	( (mrp)->mr_writer = 0, init_rwsem(&(mrp)->mr_lock) )
> +	do { (mrp)->mr_writer = 0; init_rwsem(&(mrp)->mr_lock); } while (0)
>  #define mrlock_init(mrp, t,n,s)	mrinit(mrp, n)
>  #define mrfree(mrp)		do { } while (0)
>  #define mraccess(mrp)		mraccessf(mrp, 0)

I'll queue this for mainline, via the XFS tree.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/