Re: [patch 00/61] ANNOUNCE: lock validator -V1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 29/05/06, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >We are pleased to announce the first release of the "lock dependency
> >correctness validator" kernel debugging feature, which can be downloaded
> >from:
> >
> >  http://redhat.com/~mingo/lockdep-patches/
> >
> [snip]
> 
> I get this while loading cpufreq modules
> 
> =====================================================
> [ BUG: possible circular locking deadlock detected! ]
> -----------------------------------------------------
> modprobe/1942 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&anon_vma->lock){--..}, at: [<c10609cf>] anon_vma_link+0x1d/0xc9
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&mm->mmap_sem/1){--..}, at: [<c101e5a0>] copy_process+0xbc6/0x1519
> 
> which lock already depends on the new lock,
> which could lead to circular deadlocks!

hm, this one could perhaps be a real bug. Dave: lockdep complains about 
having observed:

	anon_vma->lock  =>   mm->mmap_sem
	mm->mmap_sem    =>   anon_vma->lock

locking sequences, in the cpufreq code. Is there some special runtime 
behavior that still makes this safe, or is it a real bug?

> stack backtrace:
> <c1003f36> show_trace+0xd/0xf  <c1004449> dump_stack+0x17/0x19
> <c103863e> print_circular_bug_tail+0x59/0x64  <c1038e91>
> __lockdep_acquire+0x848/0xa39
> <c10394be> lockdep_acquire+0x69/0x82  <c11ed759>
> __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xd0/0x347

there's one small detail to improve future lockdep printouts: please set 
CONFIG_STACK_BACKTRACE_COLS=1, so that the backtrace is more readable. 
(i'll change the code to force that when CONFIG_LOCKDEP is enabled)

> BTW I still must revert lockdep-serial.patch - it doesn't compile on 
> my gcc 4.1.1

ok, will check this.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux