[patch 38/61] lock validator: special locking: i_mutex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

teach special (recursive) locking code to the lock validator. Has no
effect on non-lockdep kernels.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/usb/core/inode.c |    2 +-
 fs/namei.c               |   24 ++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/fs.h       |   14 ++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: linux/drivers/usb/core/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/usb/core/inode.c
+++ linux/drivers/usb/core/inode.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static void update_sb(struct super_block
 	if (!root)
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&root->d_inode->i_mutex);
+	mutex_lock_nested(&root->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(bus, &root->d_subdirs, d_u.d_child) {
 		if (bus->d_inode) {
Index: linux/fs/namei.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/fs/namei.c
+++ linux/fs/namei.c
@@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ struct dentry *lock_rename(struct dentry
 	struct dentry *p;
 
 	if (p1 == p2) {
-		mutex_lock(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex);
+		mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
@@ -1430,30 +1430,30 @@ struct dentry *lock_rename(struct dentry
 
 	for (p = p1; p->d_parent != p; p = p->d_parent) {
 		if (p->d_parent == p2) {
-			mutex_lock(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex);
-			mutex_lock(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex);
+			mutex_lock_nested(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+			mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
 			return p;
 		}
 	}
 
 	for (p = p2; p->d_parent != p; p = p->d_parent) {
 		if (p->d_parent == p1) {
-			mutex_lock(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex);
-			mutex_lock(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex);
+			mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+			mutex_lock_nested(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
 			return p;
 		}
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex);
-	mutex_lock(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex);
+	mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+	mutex_lock_nested(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
 	return NULL;
 }
 
 void unlock_rename(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
 {
-	mutex_unlock(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock_non_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex);
 	if (p1 != p2) {
-		mutex_unlock(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex);
+		mutex_unlock_non_nested(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex);
 		mutex_unlock(&p1->d_inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
 	}
 }
@@ -1750,7 +1750,7 @@ struct dentry *lookup_create(struct name
 {
 	struct dentry *dentry = ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
 
-	mutex_lock(&nd->dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
+	mutex_lock_nested(&nd->dentry->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
 	/*
 	 * Yucky last component or no last component at all?
 	 * (foo/., foo/.., /////)
@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static long do_rmdir(int dfd, const char
 			error = -EBUSY;
 			goto exit1;
 	}
-	mutex_lock(&nd.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
+	mutex_lock_nested(&nd.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
 	dentry = lookup_hash(&nd);
 	error = PTR_ERR(dentry);
 	if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
@@ -2081,7 +2081,7 @@ static long do_unlinkat(int dfd, const c
 	error = -EISDIR;
 	if (nd.last_type != LAST_NORM)
 		goto exit1;
-	mutex_lock(&nd.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
+	mutex_lock_nested(&nd.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
 	dentry = lookup_hash(&nd);
 	error = PTR_ERR(dentry);
 	if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
Index: linux/include/linux/fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/fs.h
+++ linux/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -558,6 +558,20 @@ struct inode {
 };
 
 /*
+ * inode->i_mutex nesting types for the LOCKDEP validator:
+ *
+ * 0: the object of the current VFS operation
+ * 1: parent
+ * 2: child/target
+ */
+enum inode_i_mutex_lock_type
+{
+	I_MUTEX_NORMAL,
+	I_MUTEX_PARENT,
+	I_MUTEX_CHILD
+};
+
+/*
  * NOTE: in a 32bit arch with a preemptable kernel and
  * an UP compile the i_size_read/write must be atomic
  * with respect to the local cpu (unlike with preempt disabled),
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux