[patch 49/61] lock validator: special locking: sched.c

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

teach special (recursive) locking code to the lock validator. Has no
effect on non-lockdep kernels.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/sched.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ static void double_rq_unlock(runqueue_t 
 	__releases(rq1->lock)
 	__releases(rq2->lock)
 {
-	spin_unlock(&rq1->lock);
+	spin_unlock_non_nested(&rq1->lock);
 	if (rq1 != rq2)
 		spin_unlock(&rq2->lock);
 	else
@@ -1980,7 +1980,7 @@ static void double_lock_balance(runqueue
 {
 	if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&busiest->lock))) {
 		if (busiest->cpu < this_rq->cpu) {
-			spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
+			spin_unlock_non_nested(&this_rq->lock);
 			spin_lock(&busiest->lock);
 			spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
 		} else
@@ -2602,7 +2602,7 @@ static int load_balance_newidle(int this
 		nr_moved = move_tasks(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
 					minus_1_or_zero(busiest->nr_running),
 					imbalance, sd, NEWLY_IDLE, NULL);
-		spin_unlock(&busiest->lock);
+		spin_unlock_non_nested(&busiest->lock);
 	}
 
 	if (!nr_moved) {
@@ -2687,7 +2687,7 @@ static void active_load_balance(runqueue
 	else
 		schedstat_inc(sd, alb_failed);
 out:
-	spin_unlock(&target_rq->lock);
+	spin_unlock_non_nested(&target_rq->lock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3032,7 +3032,7 @@ static void wake_sleeping_dependent(int 
 	}
 
 	for_each_cpu_mask(i, sibling_map)
-		spin_unlock(&cpu_rq(i)->lock);
+		spin_unlock_non_nested(&cpu_rq(i)->lock);
 	/*
 	 * We exit with this_cpu's rq still held and IRQs
 	 * still disabled:
@@ -3068,7 +3068,7 @@ static int dependent_sleeper(int this_cp
 	 * The same locking rules and details apply as for
 	 * wake_sleeping_dependent():
 	 */
-	spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
+	spin_unlock_non_nested(&this_rq->lock);
 	sibling_map = sd->span;
 	for_each_cpu_mask(i, sibling_map)
 		spin_lock(&cpu_rq(i)->lock);
@@ -3146,7 +3146,7 @@ check_smt_task:
 	}
 out_unlock:
 	for_each_cpu_mask(i, sibling_map)
-		spin_unlock(&cpu_rq(i)->lock);
+		spin_unlock_non_nested(&cpu_rq(i)->lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 #else
@@ -6680,7 +6680,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 		prio_array_t *array;
 
 		rq = cpu_rq(i);
-		spin_lock_init(&rq->lock);
+		spin_lock_init_static(&rq->lock);
 		rq->nr_running = 0;
 		rq->active = rq->arrays;
 		rq->expired = rq->arrays + 1;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/