Hello Pavel,
'nice' is everything what works fine as a solution. Therefore, I would
say that the ndiswrapper is nice, if the case is that no Linux Driver is
available. And if you have no time or the knowledge (programming or chip
set information) to implement a driver by your own, then is the
ndiswrapper a good solution.
Yes, the design is not the best, but it works or not?! ;-)
Regards,
Jens
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sun 28-05-06 08:45:12, Jens G?tze wrote:
>> Hello Marc,
>>
>> I would try ndiswrapper (http://ndiswrapper.sf.net), because it is the
>> easiest way to run a USB Wireless LAN adapter. The ndiswrapper is a nice
>> driver, which allows to run Windows NDIS Driver under Linux. Therefore,
>
> For some very obscure definition of 'nice'...
>
> Avoid ndiswrapper, it is broken by design.
> Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
