On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:23:43AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Wu Fengguang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +#define PAGE_REFCNT_0 0
> > +#define PAGE_REFCNT_1 (1 << PG_referenced)
> > +#define PAGE_REFCNT_2 (1 << PG_active)
> > +#define PAGE_REFCNT_3 ((1 << PG_active) | (1 << PG_referenced))
> > +#define PAGE_REFCNT_MASK PAGE_REFCNT_3
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * STATUS REFERENCE COUNT
> > + * __ 0
> > + * _R PAGE_REFCNT_1
> > + * A_ PAGE_REFCNT_2
> > + * AR PAGE_REFCNT_3
> > + *
> > + * A/R: Active / Referenced
> > + */
> > +static inline unsigned long page_refcnt(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + return page->flags & PAGE_REFCNT_MASK;
> > +}
> > +
>
> This assumes that PG_referenced < PG_active. Nobody knows that this
> assumption was made and someone might go and reorder the page flags and
> subtly break readahead.
>
> We need to either not do it this way, or put a big comment in page-flags.h,
> or even redefine PG_active to be PG_referenced+1.
I have had a code segment like:
#if PG_active < PG_referenced
# error unexpected page flags order
#endif
I'd add it back.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
