Re: [PATCH] POSIX-hostname up to 255 characters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-05-26 10:28:13 -0700, Randy.Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2006, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
[Patch touchin all archs]
> > ...and this should have gone to linux-arch, too...
> 
> so how does someone know:
> (a) that this should have gone to linux-arch

Anything that modifies all architectures (eg. new system calls,
low-level MM changes, ...) should go to linux-arch. This is where all
architecture maintainers are expected to be around.

> (b) that linux-arch exists

Noticing the existance of linux-arch is admittedly a hard job. It's a
quite specialized low-volume list, so most people actually never ever
recognize it--unfortunately.

> (c) what it's full email address it?

The list's email address is [email protected]

> I.e., where is all of this explained?

Nowhere :-/

MfG, JBG

-- 
Jan-Benedict Glaw       [email protected]    . +49-172-7608481             _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg  _ _ O
 für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger"  | im Internet! |   im Irak!   O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux