On Fri, 2006-05-26 10:28:13 -0700, Randy.Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2006, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: [Patch touchin all archs] > > ...and this should have gone to linux-arch, too... > > so how does someone know: > (a) that this should have gone to linux-arch Anything that modifies all architectures (eg. new system calls, low-level MM changes, ...) should go to linux-arch. This is where all architecture maintainers are expected to be around. > (b) that linux-arch exists Noticing the existance of linux-arch is admittedly a hard job. It's a quite specialized low-volume list, so most people actually never ever recognize it--unfortunately. > (c) what it's full email address it? The list's email address is [email protected] > I.e., where is all of this explained? Nowhere :-/ MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] POSIX-hostname up to 255 characters
- From: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] POSIX-hostname up to 255 characters
- References:
- [PATCH] POSIX-hostname up to 255 characters
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] POSIX-hostname up to 255 characters
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] POSIX-hostname up to 255 characters
- From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] POSIX-hostname up to 255 characters
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] POSIX-hostname up to 255 characters
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] x86 clean up nmi panic messages
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rtXYZ hangs at boot on quad Opteron
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] POSIX-hostname up to 255 characters
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] POSIX-hostname up to 255 characters
- Index(es):
 |