"Jan Beulich" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> Andrew Morton <[email protected]> 25.05.06 07:23 >>>
> >"Jan Beulich" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> #define SAVE_ALL \
> >> cld; \
> >> pushl %es; \
> >> + CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 4;\
> >> + /*CFI_REL_OFFSET es, 0;*/\
> >> pushl %ds; \
> >
> >arch/i386/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages:
> >arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: CFI instruction used without previous .cfi_startproc
> >arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Warning: rest of line ignored; first ignored character is `4'
> >arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: CFI instruction used without previous .cfi_startproc
> >arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Warning: rest of line ignored; first ignored character is `4'
> >arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: CFI instruction used without previous .cfi_startproc
> >arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Warning: rest of line ignored; first ignored character is `4'
> >arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: CFI instruction used without previous .cfi_startproc
> >
> >etcetera. And
> >
> >arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: no such instruction: `eax,0'
> >arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: no such instruction: `ebp,0'
> >
> >
> >bix:/usr/src/25> as --version
> >GNU assembler 2.14.90.0.6 20030820
>
> Still doesn't make sense to me, assuming the merge didn't corrupt anything. The oldest assembler I'm using is
> 2.15.90.0.1.1, but as said before your assembler clearly also supports .cfi_*. Any chance I could see the offending
> entry.S?
>
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/entry.S
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
